Thing 6: Networks – Academia.edu, ResearchGate and Google Scholar

 

shore

“If only I knew someone else researching the effects of Teflon on the physics of cartoon cat-and-mouse capers…”
Photo by Kleiton Silva on Unsplash

 

Increasingly, researchers are expected to be part of online networks. If you can’t be found through a search engine, you’re severely limiting opportunities for others to find you and your work, and online presence can be a significant part of research impact (as we’ll discuss in Thing 16). What’s more, if you know how to search and exploit these networks, you gain access to thousands of researchers around the world. Who knows who you’ll meet?

Academia.edu and ResearchGate

These are currently two of the most popular networks for academic researchers. There are many others, but these are two of the most established (both founded in 2008). You can create a profile, share your publications, monitor statistics of readers and connect with other researchers in your field, though the advanced functionality differs between the two. It is useful to note that both Academia.edu and ResearchGate profiles feature highly in Google searches and a recent study suggests that articles posted on Academia.edu get 69% more citations after 5 years than similar publications not available online. Both are great places to makes contacts, create a professional-looking profile to link to on your CV, and to regularly update your research activity.

 

Specific functionality:

  • Academia.edu allows you to write update posts on your activities, upload papers and other documents which might include ‘grey’ literature such as conference papers, as well as link to your journal articles. It can also tell you how many people have viewed your profile, what keywords they used to find you, and who is following your work. You can also follow the profiles of other scholars, which is useful to keep up to date with people’s publications.
  • ResearchGate does most of the things that Academia.edu does, but also creates opportunities for research collaboration between users. For example, users can post messages that can be public or private. It also supports conversation strings between users which focus on a research interest or paper, and you can ‘follow’ a research interest, in addition to following individual users. It has a blogging feature for users to write short reviews on peer-reviewed articles. ResearchGate also suggests connections, based on mutual research interests. Users can also post questions which get sent to users with relevant expertise. It has private chat rooms where researchers can share data, edit shared documents, or discuss confidential topics. Participants can get a higher “score” which ranks their “reputation” by providing popular answers to questions and other metrics.

 

Something to consider:

  • Although there are undoubted benefits to sharing your research topics with others in the field and making yourself more visible, do be aware of what you are signing up for. Recently, Academia.edu has attracted criticism for its attempts to monetise how members use the site – offering a ‘premium’ service for a fee and ranking papers in searches according to the status of users. Be aware that despite the .edu address, this is a .com company that generates revenue through your involvement. This doesn’t mean that it is not a useful or reputable service, but there are questions remaining about how our data is used. Be selective about what you upload – for example, some people will post links to their research on the site, but not upload the whole paper.
  • ResearchGate remains in discussion with major publishers about copyright issues surrounding material uploaded to the site. Scholars must be careful that if they make their research available for free they are not contravening agreements already signed with publishers. You are also likely to receive frequent emails inviting you to join research collaborations with a rather low hit rate for appropriateness.
  • Some people think that these issues are less to do with Academia.edu and ResearchGate particularly and more a reflection of the academic publishing industry generally. Some alternative platforms exist, such as ScholarlyHub. These alternatively currently have less reach, so will do less for boosting your profile, but will certainly offer opportunities to network, share research and establish your professional image. Controversial times, and perhaps something for you next blog post…

 

The new contender

You may also want to consider setting up a Google Scholar profile for yourself. As well as using Google Scholar to search for publications and citations, you can now create a profile (public or private). This can make you easier to contact for those seeking your research. Profiles allow you to automatically or manually add links to your publications, and you can create a ‘library’ by tagging interesting articles on google scholar for later reading. You can list your research interests, see metrics on citations of your own work, and set up email alerts.

Signing up is quick and easy, though you do need to have a gmail account, as well as give your university email address for verification.

You can install a google scholar ‘button’ on your browser, which allows you to switch a search from normal google to google scholar, save and format citations, and find the full text of articles via their title.

If you already have a profile, consider ‘cleaning it up’ and these tips for maximising impact; like most things, it requires a bit of care and attention to get the most out of it.

As with anything Google, the tools can be incredible useful and easy, and while Google Scholar profiles are a relatively recent development, it is likely to become increasingly the norm to have one. Do, however, weigh up how comfortable you are with how your data will be used, especially if it is integrated with your other accounts. Be aware of some of the limitations, as with any platform.

 

Task
You’re not required to set up an account on these networks to finish this Thing, but it is recommended. If you are considering continuing a career in research, either inside or outside academia, they can be a significant boost to your profile. You’ll need an account to explore many of the tools’ features, and it’s a good way to improve your professional research presence online.

Before you pick one, spend some time working out which will be most relevant for you. Different research disciplines may have different preferences for one network or the other; ResearchGate is generally preferred in the Sciences, while Academia.edu is more popular in the Humanities. Google scholar works well across the disciplines, though has more limited functions.

Remember that multiple factors will influence which of these networks better for you!

Why not ask some of your colleagues which network they use. Alternatively, you could try Googling the names of some of the prominent researchers in your field to see which network pops up as the most popular.

 

Once you’ve worked out which network is best, create an account. Getting an account is simple, and you can register from each tool’s home page. Make sure you fill in your profile fully. Upload/register your academic papers to your profile. Once you’ve signed up, try adding colleagues or other contacts. If you already have a profile but haven’t used it very much, you might think about these aspects next. It’s important to keep all profiles like this up to date, so that they reflect your research activities and progression to potential readers.

 Exploring further

Try using the network to search for and connect with other researchers in your field. The papers and authors you have cited in your literature review are a good place to start. If you’re using ResearchGate, why not have a look for any active discussions over your research topic?

 

Week 3 blog post

We’d like to hear what you have to say about some of the networking tools we’ve discussed. Feel free to talk about all of the tools in one post, as they lend themselves to comparison and discussion. Did you choose to use one tool over the other? Do you think these tools offer a good way to present your professional profile, or do you prefer something else (a website, blog, etc.)?

If you use Facebook, do you feel that Google Scholar, Academia.edu and ResearchGate are a suitable alternative space for professional activities, or do you find Facebook works just as well if not better for what you want to do?

cabin.jpg

“No one is getting their hands on my revolutionary neo-Deleuzian take on 17th-century Dutch politics of sovereignty and reader-reception of the Country House poem!”
Photo by Adam Bixby on Unsplash

Author: rdpsurrey

Providing personal and professional development opportunities to researchers at the University of Surrey.

3 thoughts on “Thing 6: Networks – Academia.edu, ResearchGate and Google Scholar”

    1. Hi Brett,
      thanks very much for adding this. We have not covered Microsoft Academic, and I have to confess I haven’t used it since the relaunch in 2016. Interested to know more, though. (Perhaps a good topic for one of our bloggers!)

      Liked by 1 person

  1. One nice feature of ResearchGate that I’ve found useful in the past is the ability to post questions to the community. If you have a technical or methodological question, ResearchGate will identify users who may have the expertise to answer your query, based on the skills they have included in their profile, and suggest it to them. And likewise, RG will suggest questions it thinks you may be able to answer. This can be a good way of sharing expertise and building your network if you have skills in a certain area.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s